考研英语报刊文章阅读及剖析十一

雕龙文库 分享 时间: 收藏本文

考研英语报刊文章阅读及剖析十一

  考研英语报刊文章阅读及剖析(11)

  A distant, oversize world causes cosmic confusion

  The discovery of planets around distant stars has become like space-shuttle launches--newsworthy but just barely. With some 50 extrasolar planets under their belt, astronomers have to announce something really strange to get anyone s attention.

  Last week they did just that. Standing in front of colleagues and reporters at the American Astronomical Society s semiannual meeting in San Diego, the world s premier planet-hunting team--astronomer Geoffrey Marcy of the University of California, Berkeley, and his colleagues--presented not one but two remarkable finds. The first is a pair of planets, each about the mass of Jupiter, that whirl around their home star 15 light-years from Earth in perfect lockstep. One takes 30 days to complete an orbit, the other exactly twice as long. Nobody has ever seen such a configuration. But the second discovery is far stranger--a solar system 123 light-years away, in the constellation Serpens, that harbors one ordinary planet and another so huge--17 times as massive as Jupiter--that nobody can quite figure out what it can be. It is, says Marcy, a bit frightening.

  What s frightening is that these discoveries make it clear how little astronomers know about planets, and they add to the dawning realization that our solar system--and by implication Planet Earth--may be a cosmic oddball. For years theorists figured that other stars would have planets more or less like the ones going around the sun. But starting with the 1995 discovery of the first extrasolar planet--a gassy monster like Jupiter but orbiting seven times as close to its star as Mercury orbits around our sun--each new find has seemed stranger than the last. Searchers have found more hot Jupiters like that first discovery. These include huge planets that career around their stars not in circular orbits but in elongated ones; their gravity would send any Earthlike neighbors flying off into space. Says Princeton astronomer Scott Tremaine: Not a single prediction for what we d find in other systems has turned out to be correct.

  Last week s giant was the most unexpected discovery yet. Conventional theory suggests that it must have formed like a star, from a collapsing cloud of interstellar gas. Its smaller companion, only seven times Jupiter s mass, is almost certainly a planet, formed by the buildup of gas and dust left over from a star s formation. Yet the fact that these two orbs are so close together suggests to some theorists that they must have formed together--so maybe the bigger one is a planet after all.

  Or maybe astronomers will have to rethink their definition of planet. Just because we put heavenly objects into categories doesn t mean the distinctions are necessarily valid. And as Tremaine puts it, When your classification schemes start breaking down, you know you re learning something exciting. This is wonderful stuff.

  By Michael D. Lemonick Time; 01/22/2001, Vol. 157 Issue 3, p51, 2/3p, 1 diagram

  1. The author believes that ____________.

  [A] the discovery of planets is as important as the launch of space shuttles

  [B] astronomers have been making a lot of discoveries of planets

  [C] the public have no interest in astronomical discoveries

  [D] there is little for astronomers to discover now

  2.The two finds are remarkable in that ___________.

  [A] the planets are far from our solar system

  [B] the sizes of the plants are too huge.

  [C] astronomers have never seen similar orbiting pattern and size before

  [D] scientists can not figure out what they can be

  3. By saying that our solar system may be a cosmic oddball, the author intends to render

  the idea that ______________.

  [A] other stars have planets more or less like the one going around the sun

  [B] the orbits of extrasolar planets around their stars are elongated ones

  [C] the way planets orbiting around the sun in our solar system is quite unique

  [D] planets in other systems are generally huger than the ones in ours

  4. The case of the giant heavenly body demonstrates that _________.

  [A] conventional theory can not explain such astronomical phenomenon satisfactorily

  [B] it is either a star or a planet

  [C] it was formed like a star and orbits like a planet

  [D] theorists give a wrong definition of planet

  5. The best title for this passage could be ___________.

  [A] New Planetary Puzzlers

  [B] Two Remarkable Finds

  [C] A Redefinition of Planet

  [D] Hot Jupiters Challenging Conventional Theory

  答案:B C C A A

  篇章剖析:

  本篇文章讲述了安第斯山区的最新考古发现以及这一发现的重大意义。第一段想象了当年印加人参加活人祭祀前后的场景,引出话题;第二段简要介绍考古学家莱茵哈德及他这次发现的三具印加儿童遗体。第三段、第四段描述了同时发现的陪葬品,最后一段则说明这次发现对于考古学家的重要意义。文章层次分明,结构清晰。

  词汇注释:

  semiannual: [5semi5AnjuEl] adj. 半年一次的

  premier: [5premjE] adj. 第一的, 首要的

  Jupiter: [5dVu:pitE] n. 木星

  lockstep: [`lCkstep] n. 前后紧接, 步伐一致

  configuration: [kEn7fi^ju5reiFEn] n. 【天】相对位置, 方位

  constellation: [kCnstE5leiFEn] n. [天]星群, 星座

  Serpens: [5sE:penz] n. [天]巨蛇座

  oddball:[ 5RdbC:l] n. 古怪的人;古怪的事物

  Mercury: [5mE:kjuri] n.〈天〉水星

  elongate: [5i:lCN^eit] v. 拉长, 伸长, 延长

  interstellar: [5intE5stelE] adj. 星际的

  orb: [C:b] n. 球, 天体, 圆形物

  难句突破:

  Whats frightening is that these discoveries make it clear how little astronomers know about planets, and they add to the dawning realization that our solar system --- and by implication Planet Earth --- may be a cosmic oddball.

  主体句式:whats frightening is that

  结构分析:本句是个复杂句,包含主语从句,表语从句,宾语从句,同位语从句,插入语等,另外一些成语词组的出现也增加了句子的难度,比如dawning realization,by implication等。阅读本句的时候应该先看各个分句在句中的成分以及相互之间的关系,然后再看各部分具体的意义。

  句子译文:真正令人震惊的是,这些发现说明天文学家对于行星的了解十分有限,并且让人们清醒地认识到我们的太阳---不言而喻,还有地球这颗行星---也许是宇宙中的异数。

  

  考研英语报刊文章阅读及剖析(11)

  A distant, oversize world causes cosmic confusion

  The discovery of planets around distant stars has become like space-shuttle launches--newsworthy but just barely. With some 50 extrasolar planets under their belt, astronomers have to announce something really strange to get anyone s attention.

  Last week they did just that. Standing in front of colleagues and reporters at the American Astronomical Society s semiannual meeting in San Diego, the world s premier planet-hunting team--astronomer Geoffrey Marcy of the University of California, Berkeley, and his colleagues--presented not one but two remarkable finds. The first is a pair of planets, each about the mass of Jupiter, that whirl around their home star 15 light-years from Earth in perfect lockstep. One takes 30 days to complete an orbit, the other exactly twice as long. Nobody has ever seen such a configuration. But the second discovery is far stranger--a solar system 123 light-years away, in the constellation Serpens, that harbors one ordinary planet and another so huge--17 times as massive as Jupiter--that nobody can quite figure out what it can be. It is, says Marcy, a bit frightening.

  What s frightening is that these discoveries make it clear how little astronomers know about planets, and they add to the dawning realization that our solar system--and by implication Planet Earth--may be a cosmic oddball. For years theorists figured that other stars would have planets more or less like the ones going around the sun. But starting with the 1995 discovery of the first extrasolar planet--a gassy monster like Jupiter but orbiting seven times as close to its star as Mercury orbits around our sun--each new find has seemed stranger than the last. Searchers have found more hot Jupiters like that first discovery. These include huge planets that career around their stars not in circular orbits but in elongated ones; their gravity would send any Earthlike neighbors flying off into space. Says Princeton astronomer Scott Tremaine: Not a single prediction for what we d find in other systems has turned out to be correct.

  Last week s giant was the most unexpected discovery yet. Conventional theory suggests that it must have formed like a star, from a collapsing cloud of interstellar gas. Its smaller companion, only seven times Jupiter s mass, is almost certainly a planet, formed by the buildup of gas and dust left over from a star s formation. Yet the fact that these two orbs are so close together suggests to some theorists that they must have formed together--so maybe the bigger one is a planet after all.

  Or maybe astronomers will have to rethink their definition of planet. Just because we put heavenly objects into categories doesn t mean the distinctions are necessarily valid. And as Tremaine puts it, When your classification schemes start breaking down, you know you re learning something exciting. This is wonderful stuff.

  By Michael D. Lemonick Time; 01/22/2001, Vol. 157 Issue 3, p51, 2/3p, 1 diagram

  1. The author believes that ____________.

  [A] the discovery of planets is as important as the launch of space shuttles

  [B] astronomers have been making a lot of discoveries of planets

  [C] the public have no interest in astronomical discoveries

  [D] there is little for astronomers to discover now

  2.The two finds are remarkable in that ___________.

  [A] the planets are far from our solar system

  [B] the sizes of the plants are too huge.

  [C] astronomers have never seen similar orbiting pattern and size before

  [D] scientists can not figure out what they can be

  3. By saying that our solar system may be a cosmic oddball, the author intends to render

  the idea that ______________.

  [A] other stars have planets more or less like the one going around the sun

  [B] the orbits of extrasolar planets around their stars are elongated ones

  [C] the way planets orbiting around the sun in our solar system is quite unique

  [D] planets in other systems are generally huger than the ones in ours

  4. The case of the giant heavenly body demonstrates that _________.

  [A] conventional theory can not explain such astronomical phenomenon satisfactorily

  [B] it is either a star or a planet

  [C] it was formed like a star and orbits like a planet

  [D] theorists give a wrong definition of planet

  5. The best title for this passage could be ___________.

  [A] New Planetary Puzzlers

  [B] Two Remarkable Finds

  [C] A Redefinition of Planet

  [D] Hot Jupiters Challenging Conventional Theory

  答案:B C C A A

  篇章剖析:

  本篇文章讲述了安第斯山区的最新考古发现以及这一发现的重大意义。第一段想象了当年印加人参加活人祭祀前后的场景,引出话题;第二段简要介绍考古学家莱茵哈德及他这次发现的三具印加儿童遗体。第三段、第四段描述了同时发现的陪葬品,最后一段则说明这次发现对于考古学家的重要意义。文章层次分明,结构清晰。

  词汇注释:

  semiannual: [5semi5AnjuEl] adj. 半年一次的

  premier: [5premjE] adj. 第一的, 首要的

  Jupiter: [5dVu:pitE] n. 木星

  lockstep: [`lCkstep] n. 前后紧接, 步伐一致

  configuration: [kEn7fi^ju5reiFEn] n. 【天】相对位置, 方位

  constellation: [kCnstE5leiFEn] n. [天]星群, 星座

  Serpens: [5sE:penz] n. [天]巨蛇座

  oddball:[ 5RdbC:l] n. 古怪的人;古怪的事物

  Mercury: [5mE:kjuri] n.〈天〉水星

  elongate: [5i:lCN^eit] v. 拉长, 伸长, 延长

  interstellar: [5intE5stelE] adj. 星际的

  orb: [C:b] n. 球, 天体, 圆形物

  难句突破:

  Whats frightening is that these discoveries make it clear how little astronomers know about planets, and they add to the dawning realization that our solar system --- and by implication Planet Earth --- may be a cosmic oddball.

  主体句式:whats frightening is that

  结构分析:本句是个复杂句,包含主语从句,表语从句,宾语从句,同位语从句,插入语等,另外一些成语词组的出现也增加了句子的难度,比如dawning realization,by implication等。阅读本句的时候应该先看各个分句在句中的成分以及相互之间的关系,然后再看各部分具体的意义。

  句子译文:真正令人震惊的是,这些发现说明天文学家对于行星的了解十分有限,并且让人们清醒地认识到我们的太阳---不言而喻,还有地球这颗行星---也许是宇宙中的异数。

  

信息流广告 周易 易经 代理招生 二手车 网络营销 旅游攻略 非物质文化遗产 查字典 社区团购 精雕图 戏曲下载 抖音代运营 易学网 互联网资讯 成语 成语故事 诗词 工商注册 注册公司 抖音带货 云南旅游网 网络游戏 代理记账 短视频运营 在线题库 国学网 知识产权 抖音运营 雕龙客 雕塑 奇石 散文 自学教程 常用文书 河北生活网 好书推荐 游戏攻略 心理测试 石家庄人才网 考研真题 汉语知识 心理咨询 手游安卓版下载 兴趣爱好 网络知识 十大品牌排行榜 商标交易 单机游戏下载 短视频代运营 宝宝起名 范文网 电商设计 免费发布信息 服装服饰 律师咨询 搜救犬 Chat GPT中文版 经典范文 优质范文 工作总结 二手车估价 实用范文 古诗词 衡水人才网 石家庄点痣 养花 名酒回收 石家庄代理记账 女士发型 搜搜作文 石家庄人才网 钢琴入门指法教程 词典 围棋 chatGPT 读后感 玄机派 企业服务 法律咨询 chatGPT国内版 chatGPT官网 励志名言 河北代理记账公司 文玩 语料库 游戏推荐 男士发型 高考作文 PS修图 儿童文学 买车咨询 工作计划 礼品厂 舟舟培训 IT教程 手机游戏推荐排行榜 暖通,电地暖, 女性健康 苗木供应 ps素材库 短视频培训 优秀个人博客 包装网 创业赚钱 养生 民间借贷律师 绿色软件 安卓手机游戏 手机软件下载 手机游戏下载 单机游戏大全 免费软件下载 石家庄论坛 网赚 手游下载 游戏盒子 职业培训 资格考试 成语大全 英语培训 艺术培训 少儿培训 苗木网 雕塑网 好玩的手机游戏推荐 汉语词典 中国机械网 美文欣赏 红楼梦 道德经 标准件 电地暖 网站转让 鲜花 书包网 英语培训机构 电商运营